通过引用传递解引用的指针时了解C ++堆/堆栈分配

在此示例中，我试图了解对象创建和销毁的情况。

#include <iostream>

class Person {
public:
    const char* name;
    Person(const char* name) : name(name) {
        std::cout << "Person " << name << " created" << std::endl;
    };
    ~Person() {
        std::cout << "Person " << name << " destroyed" << std::endl;
    }
};

class Family {
public:
    Person mom, dad;
    Family(Person& m, Person& d) : mom(m), dad(d) {
        std::cout << "Family created" << std::endl;
    };
    ~Family() {
        std::cout << "Family destroyed" << std::endl;
    }
};

int main()
{
    Person* m = new Person("Jane");
    Person* d = new Person("John");
    Family f(*m, *d);

    return 0;
}

这个输出

Person Jane created                                                                                                                     
Person John created                                                                                                                     
Family created                                                                                                                          
Family destroyed                                                                                                                        
Person John destroyed                                                                                                                   
Person Jane destroyed

So I am not entirely sure how to interpret this. I've been taught that anything I heap-allocate using the new keyword should subsequently be delete-d. And stack variables are lost when the object moves out of scope. My understanding is like this. If instead of accepting Person& m by reference I took it without the &, like Person m, then m would be copied here (on the stack) and I'd have a memory leak because the heap-allocated new Person("Jane") would never be deleted.

But since I am taking it by reference, do I still have a memory leak? Both m and d have their destructors called, but does this also free the heap-memory? And how can I think of Family.dad? Is this a stack variable? If so, then is the entire Family considered a scope?

I am quite confused by this example and don't really know how to reason about it. Also, do I still have a memory leak here since I never explicitly delete the two Person objects?